FWIW, I also wondered why the lawyer had to be female and a mother. It's a strange requirement. I'd hire an effective gay bachelor male lawyer over a less competent female mother-lawyer any day.


I'd hire an effective gay bachelor male lawyer over a less competent female mother-lawyer any day.
Buttercup wrote:I guess she's just frustrated with being patronised and dismissed and is looking for someone she can empathise with, as she thinks this kind of bond will help, more than simply money.
You see this in teaching. Some adults don't want to 'bond'; they call their teacher an 'instructor' and want a very business-like relationship. Others want a teacher they can establish similarities with because they think it enhances their learning. Maybe it does?
It may seem dumb to you, but there's evidence of this kind of bias in every part of the service end of things. It seems pretty understandable in what must be a difficult time. Me, I'd pretty much always choose to deal with a single, 30-something British female, if a choice were there.I'd hire an effective gay bachelor male lawyer over a less competent female mother-lawyer any day.
But wouldn't you hire an effective lawyer you had something in common with over an effective lawyer you had nothing in common with, especially over child custody? (Sorry, I mean 'you' as a general example)

But wouldn't you hire an effective lawyer you had something in common with over an effective lawyer you had nothing in common with, especially over child custody? (Sorry, I mean 'you' as a general example)
Forumosans browsing this forum: No Forumosans and 1 visitor