Without looking for a fight.
Not paying child support is enough truth for me.

As far as maintenance payments go, any reasonable man would agree to pay a fair amount to support their children, as long as the mother acts fairly and in the best interests of the children. It's when the vindictive and punishing behaviour from the mother begins that the father starts to think: "hang on, why I am paying her money if she is just using it to make me suffer" ? And then the thoughts about taking legal action start ......

headhonchoII wrote:Yep, you often only get half the truth or less on these forums.



Article 1065 A child born out of wedlock who has been acknowledge by the natural father is deemed to be legitimate; where he has been maintained by the natural father, acknowledgment is deemed to have been established.
In the relation to his mother, a child born out of wedlock is deemed to be legitimate and no acknowledgment is necessary.
Article 1066 A child born out of wedlock or his mother may repudiate the acknowledgment by his natural father.
Carol Chang
Tel: 2397 1307
Fax: 2391 7592
#10-1, No. 76, Sec 1,
Zhongxiao E. Road

pugwash wrote:Article 1065 A child born out of wedlock who has been acknowledge by the natural father is deemed to be legitimate; where he has been maintained by the natural father, acknowledgment is deemed to have been established.
In the relation to his mother, a child born out of wedlock is deemed to be legitimate and no acknowledgment is necessary.Article 1066 A child born out of wedlock or his mother may repudiate the acknowledgment by his natural father.
Any web links or further information on the above would be useful. 1065 is very applicable as the child was born out of wedlock and support payments are fully paid and up to date. But its all USA documentation. is it worth the paper its written on?






Forumosans browsing this forum: No Forumosans and 1 visitor