by Tigerman » 16 Feb 2012, 11:37
Thanks for that! Made me laugh!
As it is, we seem to regard it as a positive objection to a reasoner that he has taken one side or the other. We regard it (in other words) as a positive objection to a reasoner that he has contrived to reach the object of his reasoning. We call a man a bigot or a slave of dogma because he is a thinker who has thought thoroughly and to a definite end.
From: All Things Considered - The Error of Impartiality