Alm sent his application for a new driver's licence in 2008 along with a picture of himself with a colander on his head.
The stunt got him an invitation to the doctor's to check he was mentally fit to drive, but after three years, Alm's efforts have paid off.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/ar ... 7eae10.841
(sorry, I forgot how to make neat links)
So, the question is, why does that require three years of checking mental fitness of the applicant, but one from an established religion is not questioned? When both religions are equally impossible to prove.
A Christian may wear a cross around his/her neck, a Jew or a Sikh may wear head gear. Why is a spaghetti strainer different?