Click here to go to our new forums at
If you are a Forumosan Regular, when you log in for the FIRST TIME, you must RESET your password by using the Password Recovery system.

Usernames on the new forums must not contain any SPACES and must end with LETTER or a NUMBER; if yours does, you will be prompted to change your Username
Contact us at admin(at)forumosa(dot)com or @forumosa on Twitter or on our Facebook Page if you have any questions or problems logging back in

Why is being a Muslim a bad thing?


Postby NonTocareLeTete » 06 Apr 2012, 10:21

urodacus wrote:do you mean a "U.S." vs. "them" world?

Hate to come down on you for something you said 4 years ago, but :roll:
There are anti-muslim sentiments in just about every western country that has a lot of immigration, from Great Britain to the Netherlands, not just the US. In some countries, it's even illegal to wear a burqa, and I can't see the US ever passing such legislation.
Hard-core muslims just don't assimilate well into other cultures, and that, along with blowing shit up and limiting women and threatening violence when cartoons want to depict their religious leader is where the problem stems from.

But I grew up with several muslims (in the San Francisco area), including a dear childhood friend, and she and her family were great. Just like every other group, there will be stereotypes that don't apply to the whole.
User avatar
Bird Walker (liù niǎo de rén)
Posts: 1436
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 11:55

Re: Why is being a Muslim a bad thing?

Postby finley » 06 Apr 2012, 14:03

Hard-core muslims just don't assimilate well into other cultures, and that, along with blowing shit up and limiting women and threatening violence when cartoons want to depict their religious leader is where the problem stems from.

A hardcore anybody wouldn't assimilate well. The odd thing about Islam (as I was trying to argue earlier) is that its core beliefs are virtually identical to Judaism. Yet the radicals have a huge chip on their shoulder about non-Muslims in general, and about Jews specifically. All that stuff about slaughtering the infidel is just one aspect, and, as other people have noted, it's something the average guy in the street is going to play down, just as the average (religious) Jew or Christian probably isn't especially proud of his distant ancestors' penchant for genocide.

The specific problem that Islam has is that the Koran is considered the literal, complete word of God. There is no room for interpretation. One can't say, well, yeah, that bit there (as I was arguing re. Jewish Law) was almost certainly added later by vested interests. Couple that with the fact that Islam is prevalent in repressive societies, and Islam itself becomes a tool of repression. When people can't go home and watch TVBS to unwind, they might be inclined to listen to TBTB telling them everything is (a) God's punishment for not obeying your leaders or (b) everyone else's fault for not being Muslims. Christianity was used in precisely the same way not so long ago. It just so happens that the English (for example) were a lot more ready to lop off their leader's heads if they thought they were talking shite.

The upshot is that it's harder for a Muslim to say "no, that's just sooo 6th century - we've moved on since then" than for a Christian.

I also think Islam - paradoxically, given the above - has become more perverted from its original intent than has Christianity. For example, the idea of religious leaders (who seem to cause most of the trouble) is not a core concept. It apparently arose later.

The ONLY (asfik) Roman (non-xian) reference to Jesus being crucified was one of heresay (ie not an historical account or eyewitness.

That ever-reliable source, Wikipedia, has this to say: "Most contemporary scholars agree that Jesus was a Jew who was regarded as a teacher and healer, that he was baptized by John the Baptist, and was crucified in Jerusalem on the orders of the Roman Prefect of Judaea, Pontius Pilate, on the charge of sedition against the Roman Empire". Obviously there's always room for argument.
In the Talmud it actually says he was hanged, not crucified.

I think you're nit-picking a bit here, especially since it's notoriously hard to translate old languages - some of the words have no exact modern equivalent, express very broad concepts, or we simply don't know what they meant. And why do you have a thing about not writing 'Christ-' out in full? He's not Voldemort, you know.
"Global warming is happening and we KNOW that man is 100 percent responsible!!!"
- Fred Smith
User avatar
Entering Second Childhood (èrdù tóngnián qī)
Entering Second Childhood (èrdù tóngnián qī)
Posts: 7145
Joined: 20 Jan 2011, 23:34

   Please remember that Forumosa is not responsible for the content that appears on the other side of links that Forumosans post on our forums. As a discussion website, we encourage open and frank debate. We have learned that the most effective way to address questionable claims or accusations on Forumosa is by engaging in a sincere and constructive conversation. To make this website work, we must all feel safe in expressing our opinions, this also means backing up any claims with hard facts, including links to other websites.
   Please also remember that one should not believe everything one reads on the Internet, particularly from websites whose content cannot be easily verified or substantiated. Use your common sense and do not hesitate to ask for proof.

Return to Religion & Spirituality

Who is online

Forumosans browsing this forum: No Forumosans and 0 guests