
finley wrote:That's what I thought. Surely if you can prove that the property is yours, and you take it back, you're not actually stealing anything. By definition, theft must involve taking somebody else's property. Even in Taiwan. Although, presented with that little logical conundrum, you can imagine this happening in the courtroom ...


Having papers showing that you onced owned certain things does not prove you own it now.

Satellite TV wrote:finley wrote:That's what I thought. Surely if you can prove that the property is yours, and you take it back, you're not actually stealing anything. By definition, theft must involve taking somebody else's property. Even in Taiwan. Although, presented with that little logical conundrum, you can imagine this happening in the courtroom ...
The reason you have police and courts is so that people do not become vigilantes. Having papers showing that you onced owned certain things does not prove you own it now.
As the goods have been reported stolen and insurance paid then the ownership of the property would then fall to the insurance company to follow up on. Just going to the place and taking things would yes mean you are stealing them.


Jack Burton wrote:Thanks for the headsup TM.


tsukinodeynatsu wrote:Why don't you give the court in Taipei a ring and ask them what they think?


Tigerman wrote:tsukinodeynatsu wrote:Why don't you give the court in Taipei a ring and ask them what they think?
Courts do not answer questions unless the issue is being tried.


Jack Burton wrote:Tigerman wrote:tsukinodeynatsu wrote:Why don't you give the court in Taipei a ring and ask them what they think?
Courts do not answer questions unless the issue is being tried.
waste of time.... it's like asking a Chinese for directions when he doesn't know the answer.

Return to General Legal Matters
Forumosans browsing this forum: No Forumosans and 9 visitors