Click here to go to our new forums at
If you are a Forumosan Regular, when you log in for the FIRST TIME, you must RESET your password by using the Password Recovery system.

Usernames on the new forums must not contain any SPACES and must end with LETTER or a NUMBER; if yours does, you will be prompted to change your Username
Contact us at admin(at)forumosa(dot)com or @forumosa on Twitter or on our Facebook Page if you have any questions or problems logging back in

Amniocentesis and Gender Information

All issues that are not covered by the following legal forums may be posted here.
Forum rules
While the moderators are happy to help point people in the right direction for legal assistance and to attempt to keep these forums civil and tidy, please bear in mind that an Internet forum is not the place for providing or receiving legal advice or for the creation of any attorney-client privileges or obligations. Also keep in mind that Forumosa and the moderators cannot conduct comprehensive reviews of all laws or legal concepts referenced or discussed within these forums – laws and regulations are updated and amended, interpretations do change, and sometimes the legal landscape can change very fast. Forumosa provides these legal forums for general informational purposes only. By using these legal forums, you agree that the information does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and any other posters on these forums. DO NOT CONSIDER THE FORUMS TO BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR OBTAINING LEGAL ADVICE FROM A QUALIFIED LICENSED ATTORNEY.

Amniocentesis and Gender Information

Postby Eiger John » 16 Jan 2012, 17:40

My wife just went in for an amniocentesis today, and I thought it would be worthwhile to write up something here.

Many pregnant women in Taiwan are told that, if they're over 34, they must under the law have an amniocentesis done. Also, there is a lot of talk about a new rule that Taiwanese doctors are not supposed to disclose the gender of a fetus/baby to the parents. Here's the straight story from my colleague, Indy Liu, a Taiwan-registered lawyer with a particularly strong interest in health-related legal issues:

1. Amniocentesis: There is no law that requires a compulsory amniocentesis, even for pregnant women over the age of 34. However, the Bureau of Health Promotion, the competent agency under the Dept. of Health, only strongly encourages women by providing a TWD 2,000 subsidy. This is contrary to several hospitals that have been telling pregnant women that they *must* get the check done.

2. Gender information: The DOH, under pressure from the Control Yuan and Legislative Yuan with regards to gender-screening abuse issues, issued a letter to 77 hospitals (cc'd to all local Health Bureaus, medical associations, ob-gyn associations, etc.) to state that unless it is medically necessary then it is prohibited to inform parents about the gender of the fetus/baby. Legally speaking, the letter is only an "administrative guidance" rather than binding regulations, but it is thought to have drawn a powerful line for physicians about how and what to inform patients.

In addition, according to a DOH official's statement, the DOH letter might help establish the doctor's intent -- if a doctor informs a parent of a baby's gender and the parents then get an abortion, then it might be more possible to pursue criminal charges against the doctor under Articles 289 and 290 of the Criminal Code. (The weird thing in Taiwan law is that there is a ban on abortions but that ban is filled with exceptions that are very broadly interpreted to allow abortions -- e.g., the health or mental well-being of the mother, etc.) Such establishment of "intent" may also matter if there is an administrative or professional sanction against the doctor.
"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak; and that it is doing God's service when it is violating all his laws." - John Quincy Adams

Article on enforcement of foreign court and arbitral decisions into Taiwan:
Article on Cross-Strait intellectual property basics:
Eiger John
Breakfast Store Laoban (zǎocān diàn lǎobǎn)
Breakfast Store Laoban (zǎocān diàn lǎobǎn)
Posts: 143
Joined: 13 Jul 2009, 17:14
Location: Taipei

   Please remember that Forumosa is not responsible for the content that appears on the other side of links that Forumosans post on our forums. As a discussion website, we encourage open and frank debate. We have learned that the most effective way to address questionable claims or accusations on Forumosa is by engaging in a sincere and constructive conversation. To make this website work, we must all feel safe in expressing our opinions, this also means backing up any claims with hard facts, including links to other websites.
   Please also remember that one should not believe everything one reads on the Internet, particularly from websites whose content cannot be easily verified or substantiated. Use your common sense and do not hesitate to ask for proof.

Return to General Legal Matters

Who is online

Forumosans browsing this forum: No Forumosans and 2 guests