by GuyInTaiwan » 16 May 2012, 10:31
Give them lots of real examples so they just pick it up through input. Explicit grammar instruction simply won't stick. After all, isn't that what they've been doing for the past however many years?
As for boring vs bored (not board, that's a plank or wood, or to stay somewhere), it may indeed be that your students are boring! Plenty of mine are! Anyway, again, explain it through real examples. Let the context speak for itself. The irony is that nothing is going to be more boring than a twenty-five minute explanation of the nuances between "bored" and "boring".
The question you have to ask yourself is this: If they've received hundreds of hours of explicit grammar instruction already and they still don't know any of this, is the problem that they just need even more of that (explicit grammar instruction), or that a paradigm shift is required? If you and they truly believe it's the former, then that's pretty straightforward. It's not hard to just keep doing the same thing.
Logically though, that would seem to be absurd given the results so far, at least to me. The opposition to admitting this has less to do with the veracity of such a claim though and more to do with people's resistance to change, and that's probably a much harder thing to change than ever learning the correct usage of "bored" and "boring" or "borrow" and "lend".
And you coming in to scold us all like some kind of sour-puss kindie assistant who favors olive cardigans and lemon drinks without sugar. -- Muzha Man
One sometimes gets the impression that the mere words "Socialism" and "Communism" draw towards them with magnetic force every fruit-juice drinker, nudist, sandal-wearer, sex-maniac, Quaker, "Nature Cure" quack, pacifist, and feminist in England. -- George Orwell