Procedures, processes, JFRV, potential documentation difficulties, whether to get married in Taiwan or overseas, as well as legal basis for divorce in Taiwan, including all related problems and pitfalls, child custody, alimony payments, abandonment, extra-marital affairs, and other complications...
Forum rules
While the moderators are happy to help point people in the right direction for legal assistance and to attempt to keep these forums civil and tidy, please bear in mind that an Internet forum is not the place for providing or receiving legal advice or for the creation of any attorney-client privileges or obligations. Also keep in mind that Forumosa and the moderators cannot conduct comprehensive reviews of all laws or legal concepts referenced or discussed within these forums – laws and regulations are updated and amended, interpretations do change, and sometimes the legal landscape can change very fast. Forumosa provides these legal forums for general informational purposes only. By using these legal forums, you agree that the information does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and any other posters on these forums. DO NOT CONSIDER THE FORUMS TO BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR OBTAINING LEGAL ADVICE FROM A QUALIFIED LICENSED ATTORNEY.
by sandman » 08 Apr 2010, 10:20
MilkTeaJack wrote:sandman wrote:I think its important here, especially for foreigners married to locals. Not because of trust issues in the marriage but because in the event of her death, the foreign partner will be on VERY shaky ground in terms of any assets and could easily see the government or courts or family just taking the lot, leaving you bereaved, broke and with a shaky visa situation.
And we are saying that someone in her family, be it her or a relative with clout in her life, will NOT see it this way. This is a concept we get but she very likely will not grok- and will grok some other completely different thing, a la: I want to leave you but I want to make sure I get to keep the house.
No argument from me. Its a conundrum, though. Do they have wills here? I guess they must, surely, but I've never heard of them.
-
sandman
- Manjusri (Wénshū)
-
- Posts: 30180
- Joined: 04 Jun 2001, 16:01
- 28 Recommends(s)
- 194 Recognized(s)
6000
by MilkTeaJack » 08 Apr 2010, 10:26
It just occurred to me: what if a 3rd party introduced the idea of a postnup to both of them? A mutual friend who exclaims, "What! You don't have anything to protect each other in the event of blah blah blah? Are you two insane? Go get yourself a contract asap!" And the two of you both put something down on paper, have a lawyer both of you know take a look at it, and then submit it somewhere.

twitter: jackge
Do right by yourself, you'll do right for others.
Do right by others, you'll do right for yourself.
Then on your final day of reckoning, there'll be no blame for living the life you lived.
-

MilkTeaJack
- Newspaper Copyeditor (bàoshè biānjí)

-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 13:23
- Location: Somewhere in Asia
- 2 Recognized(s)
6000
by kitedili » 08 Apr 2010, 11:01
Thank you all for your comments. Actually, we have been married for 7 years, we married in europe and had our marriage recognised in Taiwan. We are living in Taiwan for the last 2.5 years. Our relationship is not that good now, and we decided to live separately (for a while?), without divorcing (yet), so I can keep my ARC. We agree both that we should separate financial responsibilities to each other, she doesn't want to be responsible in case I have debts and on my side I want the same. So that's why I was wondering if there is any possibility to sign some documents in order to separate our responsibilities to each other. So far, our separation is going well (it is recent...), and we are (still) on good terms.
-
kitedili
- Ink Still Wet in Passport (shífēn xīnshǒu)

-
- Posts: 15
- ORIGINAL POSTER
- Joined: 22 Dec 2007, 14:32
- Location: Taipei, Taiwan
6000
by Northcoast Surfer » 08 Apr 2010, 11:26
kitedili wrote:So far, our separation is going well (it is recent...), and we are (still) on good terms.
Whatever you do, do not under any circumstances start dating any other girls or actually get involved to the point of boyfriend/girlfriend whilst you are still married. The separation won't continue to go well, and you won't be on good terms, to include legal standing in the event of a lawsuit for adultery.

-

Northcoast Surfer
- Mandarin Marvel (Guóyǔ gāoshǒu)

-
- Posts: 1885
- Joined: 30 Jun 2008, 16:37
- Location: North Coast Taiwan
- 176 Recommends(s)
- 137 Recognized(s)
6000
by scomargo » 08 Apr 2010, 16:06
I think this may be the type of thing you're looking for, but I know very little about things like this so I could be wrong:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_separationI think I remember reading about this when I was reading about John Edwards (the US politician) separating from his wife.
-

scomargo
- Gravel Truck Driver (suìshí chē sījī)

-
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: 14 Jun 2001, 16:01
- Location: Zhonghe
- 16 Recommends(s)
- 7 Recognized(s)
6000
by pgdaddy » 08 Apr 2010, 23:40
kitedili wrote:Thank you all for your comments. Actually, we have been married for 7 years, we married in europe and had our marriage recognised in Taiwan. We are living in Taiwan for the last 2.5 years. Our relationship is not that good now, and we decided to live separately (for a while?), without divorcing (yet), so I can keep my ARC. We agree both that we should separate financial responsibilities to each other, she doesn't want to be responsible in case I have debts and on my side I want the same. So that's why I was wondering if there is any possibility to sign some documents in order to separate our responsibilities to each other. So far, our separation is going well (it is recent...), and we are (still) on good terms.
Do you have children and if so who are they living with ?
-

pgdaddy
- Shoe-wielding Legislator (huīwǔ xiézi de lìfǎ wěiyuán)

-
- Posts: 247
- Joined: 30 Jul 2009, 23:12
- Location: Back in sunny Hemel
- 1 Recognized(s)
6000
by Tigerman » 09 Apr 2010, 06:37
Edgar Allen wrote:Just basic contract law - what is the consideration? i.e. if you or your wife agree to give something up in terms of your rights within the marriage, what do they (or you) get in return?
Consideration is not required in Taiwan to form a contract.
sandman wrote:Do they have wills here?
Yes.kitedili wrote:I have been married to a Taiwanese girl for few years already, and I wonder if it is possible to sign a marriage contract after a marriage in order to deal with financial issues (responsible for owning assets and debts, rights and responsibilities if and when the marriage should break up...etc) ?
If yes, does anyone know the procedure and which government office would be in charge?
You should go talk to a Taiwanese attorney. Taiwan law provides for several different marital property regimes that determine how assets are divided in the event of a divorce, or perhaps death (not sure about that). The couple simply jointly selects which of these several regimes will be used to divide property in the event of a divorce.
Edit: Just found this:
Global Property Guide - Taiwan wrote:Taiwanese matrimonial property regimes apply to couples whose marriages are recognized as valid in Taiwan.Under Taiwan’s laws, a married couple can sign a contract agreeing to either a
Community Property Regime or a
Separate Property Regime.
In the absence of such an agreement, the couple’s property will be subject to the Statutory Regime.
Under the
Community Property Regime, “separate property” is limited to: gifts designated by the donor as separate property, property essential to the husband or wife’s occupation, and property earmarked for exclusive personal use of the husband or wife.
With the exception of “separate property”, all of the couple’s property and income is “common property” and owned by the couple in common. The husband or wife must have the consent of the other to dispose of common property.
Under the
Separate Property Regime, husband and wife each retain and manage their own property as “separate property”. Each has the right to exclusively manage, use, depose of and receive profits from his or her own property.
Under the
Statutory Property Regime, property separately owned by the husband or wife prior to marriage is “premarital property”, and will remain under the sole ownership and control of the respective husband or wife. Proceeds from such premarital property (such as interest or rent income) accumulated during the marriage, and all property acquired in the marriage, are “marital property”, and are owned by the couple jointly.
Marital property in relation to inheritance is subject to the rules on “Reserved Portions”
As it is, we seem to regard it as a positive objection to a reasoner that he has taken one side or the other. We regard it (in other words) as a positive objection to a reasoner that he has contrived to reach the object of his reasoning. We call a man a bigot or a slave of dogma because he is a thinker who has thought thoroughly and to a definite end.
From: All Things Considered - The Error of Impartiality
-

Tigerman
- Guan Yin (Guānyīn)
-
- Posts: 16487
- Joined: 17 Sep 2002, 12:09
- 178 Recommends(s)
- 94 Recognized(s)
6000
by catfish13 » 09 Apr 2010, 14:58
Are prenups considered legally binding documents in Taiwan? Just wondering of course, obviously you guys are talking about postnups which are essentially the same thing. Well, I guess technically not since local laws re: marriage probably prevail against postnups since it's an agreement decided after you've legally established your relations with your partner.
-
catfish13
- Chinese Class Dropout (Zhōngwén kè zhōngchuòshēng)

-
- Posts: 782
- Joined: 01 Jun 2009, 23:58
- Location: Taipei
6000
by Tigerman » 10 Apr 2010, 14:02
catfish13 wrote:Are prenups considered legally binding documents in Taiwan?
I think that in theory prenups are valid under Taiwan's Civil Code... But, in practice, prenups are often ruled invalid for violating Taiwan's "good morals" with respect to alimony and child custody issues. You should speak with a Taiwanese attorney to make certain this is correct and or to clarify.
As it is, we seem to regard it as a positive objection to a reasoner that he has taken one side or the other. We regard it (in other words) as a positive objection to a reasoner that he has contrived to reach the object of his reasoning. We call a man a bigot or a slave of dogma because he is a thinker who has thought thoroughly and to a definite end.
From: All Things Considered - The Error of Impartiality
-

Tigerman
- Guan Yin (Guānyīn)
-
- Posts: 16487
- Joined: 17 Sep 2002, 12:09
- 178 Recommends(s)
- 94 Recognized(s)
6000
by hitmark » 03 Aug 2010, 13:55
you mean that marriage contact with another one after existing marriage contract with previous one? Is it right.
I think it is Judicial problem and you should consult with local Lawyer.
I hope it will help you.
-
hitmark
- Ink Still Wet in Passport (shífēn xīnshǒu)

-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 18:47
- 1 Recognized(s)
6000
Return to Marriage
Who is online
Forumosans browsing this forum: No Forumosans and 1 visitor
Remember this - very little is needed to make a happy life -- MARCUS AURELIUS