Article 51.01.03 Work Permit first, ARC second?

Work Permits, Employment Qualifications, Employer Problems
Forum rules
While the moderators are happy to help point people in the right direction for legal assistance and to attempt to keep these forums civil and tidy, please bear in mind that an Internet forum is not the place for providing or receiving legal advice or for the creation of any attorney-client privileges or obligations. Also keep in mind that Forumosa and the moderators cannot conduct comprehensive reviews of all laws or legal concepts referenced or discussed within these forums – laws and regulations are updated and amended, interpretations do change, and sometimes the legal landscape can change very fast. Forumosa provides these legal forums for general informational purposes only. By using these legal forums, you agree that the information does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and any other posters on these forums. DO NOT CONSIDER THE FORUMS TO BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR OBTAINING LEGAL ADVICE FROM A QUALIFIED LICENSED ATTORNEY.

Article 51.01.03 Work Permit first, ARC second?

Postby ironlady » 21 May 2002, 12:20

Foreigner X has just received an Article 51 "semi-open" (category 3, 'garden-variety foreigners of reasonably good character and long residence in Taiwan') work permit which was applied for by virtue of a contract with Company ABC. This work permit gives Foreigner X work rights at Company ABC from 2002 to 2007 as far as the government is concerned.

My question is, I was under the impression that having been approved for work rights with Company ABC until 2007, Foreigner X could then apply for and hold an ARC based solely on this work permission with Company ABC, even supposing Foreigner X is now on a visitors' or other visa (assuming Foreigner X can change to a resident visa on the strength of this permit...?)

The paper, however, says:
Forumosan avatar
ironlady
Goddess of Fornication & Prostitutes (tōngjiān hé jìnǚ de nǚshén)
 
Posts: 8381
ORIGINAL POSTER
Joined: 13 Nov 2001, 17:01
Location: A place where people can't sleep or teach English in McDonald's
87 Recommends(s)
321 Recognized(s)
In Taiwan since: 0- 0-1987



ARC and Article 51.01.03 Work Permit(s)

Postby gazza » 21 May 2002, 13:52

I have one of the 51.01.03 permits. I had a valid ARC (from old company who sacked me but didn't cancel the ARC) and the 5 years + of old work permits. I applied using my friend's co. and got the work permit. Went to police and got new ARC (since space on old all gone) in my friend's co. name.

The permit isn't semi-open (it is still restricted to one place of employment) and nothing is different from the old article 48 permits that I was eligible for prior to the introduction of ESA article 51.

If you haven't got a valid ARC then u'r missing
one of the required docs for the work permit application. If you managed to get an application past them then good on 'ya. As for conditions there were none cept for having all the required appliction docs. There were no conditions or restrictions upon which co. I could apply under but I hear job title is a touchy subject accroding to NNFS website. As far as I know you can stay outside the country for as long as you like (within the validity of the permit) and still keep the work permit + residence thereby making it a better deal than the APRC.
Forumosan avatar
gazza
English Teacher with Headband (bǎng tóujīn de Yīngwén lǎoshī)
English Teacher with Headband (bǎng tóujīn de Yīngwén lǎoshī)
 
Posts: 151
Joined: 14 Mar 2002, 17:01
Location: Taipei
1 Recognized(s)



ARC and Article 51.01.03 Work Permit(s)

Postby Hartzell » 21 May 2002, 20:51

The statement that you need to be currently in possession of an ARC to apply for an Article 51.01.03 work permit is a misinterpretation of the law.

I have argued with the CLA about this several times since the new law was promulgated on January 21, 2002.

There opinion is: "Bring in a case, and we will look at it."

Hence, the earlier you file your case the better.
Forumosan avatar
Hartzell
Mando-pop Singer (Guóyǔ liúxíng gēshǒu)
Mando-pop Singer (Guóyǔ liúxíng gēshǒu)
 
Posts: 2345
Joined: 31 Oct 2000, 17:01
Location: Nei Hu District, Taipei, Taiwan
19 Recognized(s)



ARC and Article 51.01.03 Work Permit(s)

Postby ironlady » 22 May 2002, 02:07

Foreigner X *does have* a currently valid ARC obtained through Company PDQ under normal work permit procedures.

However, at the time of the application under 51.01.03, Foreigner X did NOT have a valid ARC, nor did he have a copy of his old ARC, that having been lost. He obtained "stamped" documents from the Foreign Affairs police to show the duration and renewals of his former ARCs in Taiwan, which in the end were accepted by the folks doing the 51.01.03 permit (although not without explanation as they did not seem to recognize what those documents were.)

So it is definitely NOT a requirement that a foreigner hold a currently valid ARC to get a 51.01.03 work permit. In fact, Foreigner X was on a tourist visa when all this was going on, but he was able to prove the required 5 years' employment that terminated not longer than 2 years ago.

[Moderator's note: This is what I have been saying all along.]

The question is, can Foreigner X apply for an ARC **solely** through Company ABC (the "new" permit under 51.01.03), and if she/he gets one there, will it be for the full term of the "new" work permission under 51.01.03?
[Moderator's note: I do not understand the question. The term of the work permit for a 51.01.03 will be for the length of the hiring contract.]

In other words, is Foreigner X just as well off relying solely on the new 51.01.03 permit as he would have been continuing with normal employment through Company PDQ -- or even better off since the term granted is longer than the 1 year permission given under the ARC for Company PDQ?

What conditions, if any, would cause Foreigner X to lose the right to residence if he has an ARC based on this permit issued for Company ABC under 51.01.03? The Chinese text seems to suggest that there are possible conditions which would cause the invalidation of the permission under 51.01.03, but they are not spelled out. Is this just general language -- if Foreigner X gets AIDS, for example, or commits a serious crime, or something?
Forumosan avatar
ironlady
Goddess of Fornication & Prostitutes (tōngjiān hé jìnǚ de nǚshén)
 
Posts: 8381
ORIGINAL POSTER
Joined: 13 Nov 2001, 17:01
Location: A place where people can't sleep or teach English in McDonald's
87 Recommends(s)
321 Recognized(s)
In Taiwan since: 0- 0-1987



ARC and Article 51.01.03 Work Permit(s)

Postby Hartzell » 22 May 2002, 15:09

RE: Conditions which will result in cancellation of residency permission, please refer to the Immigration Law, on the web at
http://www.immigration.gov.tw
(The translation may leave a lot to be desired.)

possible cancellation of ARC
See Article 30

possible cancellation of APRC
See Article 31
Forumosan avatar
Hartzell
Mando-pop Singer (Guóyǔ liúxíng gēshǒu)
Mando-pop Singer (Guóyǔ liúxíng gēshǒu)
 
Posts: 2345
Joined: 31 Oct 2000, 17:01
Location: Nei Hu District, Taipei, Taiwan
19 Recognized(s)



FRIENDLY REMINDER
   Please remember that Forumosa is not responsible for the content that appears on the other side of links that Forumosans post on our forums. As a discussion website, we encourage open and frank debate. We have learned that the most effective way to address questionable claims or accusations on Forumosa is by engaging in a sincere and constructive conversation. To make this website work, we must all feel safe in expressing our opinions, this also means backing up any claims with hard facts, including links to other websites.
   Please also remember that one should not believe everything one reads on the Internet, particularly from websites whose content cannot be easily verified or substantiated. Use your common sense and do not hesitate to ask for proof.




Proceed to Legal Issues at Work



Who is online

Forumosans browsing this forum: No Forumosans and 3 visitors

Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils -- HECTOR BERLIOZ