Super Hans wrote:
My point was that if you inflate to the manufacturer's maximum recommended pressure, I'm not sure whether this would account for further expansion due to environmental factors such as outside air temperature, outside air pressure, road surface temperature, heat from breaking and heat from friction, or whether the maximum pressure includes all of these possibilities. What I mean is would 50psi be a safe pressure to inflate to, or would 50psi be the maximum pressure the tyre has been rated for?
Err...Good question. Recommended tyre pressures are usually quoted cold, and I've been assuming the maximum recommended tyre pressures are quoted on the same basis, but I don't know that for a fact.
I've heard a 10%-below-maximum "rule-of-thumb", but I don't know how soundly based it is.
In the past, with my UK tyres, which, for whatever reason, seemed to have relatively high maximum pressures, I'd have been below that. Here, I don't know.
This Wikipedia article is somewhat more categorical in its endorsement of high tyre pressures than I would be.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TireFor example : "
Modern tire designs allow for minimal tire contact surface deformity during high pressures, and as a result the traditional wear on the center of the tire due to reasonably high pressures is only known to very old or poorly designed tires.""reasonably high pressures" is undefined, but this is rather more specific (my underlining):-
"
It may be, that very high tire pressures have only two downsides: The sacrifice in comfort; and the increased chance of obtaining a puncture when driving over sharp objects, such as on a newly scraped gravel road. Many individuals have maintained their tire pressures at the maximum side wall printed value (inflated when cold) for the entire lifetime of the tire, with perfect wear until the end. This may be of negative economic value to the rubber and tire companies, as high tire pressures decrease wear, and minimize side wall blow outs."This matches my prejudices, so of course I'd like to believe it, but I don't know how soundly based it is, and I don't find the implication that tyre companies would deliberately encourage (or at least not discourage) sidewall blow-outs very plausible. (Edit: though in the buck-passing context of my last point below, perhaps it makes sense.)
I havn't had time to check all the articles source refs, but this one:-
http://www.nhtsa.gov/Cars/rules/rulings/TirePresFinal/FEA/TPMS3.htmlTIRE PRESSURE SURVEY AND TEST RESULTS
is a survey of the prevalence of low tyre pressures in the US vehicle fleet (VERY HIGH) and a test of tyre pressure effects on braking. The highest pressure tested is "only" 36psi, though, so it doesn't really address this issue.
Super Hans wrote:Ah - I see what you mean now. They're actually deteriorating, not wearing down.
Well, they have plenty of tread, but they're about 7 years old, and they have sidewall cracks, which
could have been caused or aggravated by my high pressures. I think these are mostly cosmetic, but some of them are big enough to give me mild concern and suggest early replacement. (or they're "death traps", of course, depending on one's attitude) .
I havn't been able to find anything specific on what constitutes unnacceptable cracking, and I suppose it would be difficult to define or measure. The UK MOT requires that you can't see the belting, which is pretty liberal. A couple of US RV (motorhome) sites suggested "no deeper than 2/32".
Less quaintly, In the rest of the world, that's about 1.6 mm, which is the same as the UK (and most US states) minimum legal tread depth. This might be a coincidence, or it might be to save them the pain of pulling another arbitary number out of their ass. Anyway, I don't drive a US RV, (many of which are big enough to be comparable to a British Heavy Goods Vehicle) and I havn't seen any description of how to measure crack depth. I can't
generally get a 0.15 mm feeler guage 1mm into the tyre, but I can in places on the worst looking one, at the highest pressure I've run (40psi), so that one, at least, might deserve the "death trap" description.
I think I have good reason to believe that sunflower oil treatment could significantly slow (though of course not reverse) crack development, but since I have another, silent thread on that I shouldn't discuss it here.
Super Hans wrote:
You're incredibly lucky. I've just had to fix a slow. Last year, or the year before, I had a stick enter through the side of the wall.
Well, you do drive a Jeep, and presumably, in "the sticks". I don't drive much at all, and very seldom off road (beach tracks a couple of times, but with lowered pressure).
My previous car (Sierra) seemed to pick up an awful lot of nails, though it had wider tyres which I suppose increases the probability if they are randomly distributed. OTOH, it could be my apparent good fortune is down to increasing student apathy, though I don't really think so.
Super Hans wrote:Ha. Good luck with that, but if you get any feedback, I'd like to know what they say. I've just forked out on a couple of Bridgestones for the rear, and will be purchasing the front lot next week.
As you probably know, Bridgestone/Firestone had a damaging legal dispute with Ford over Explorer rollover incidents, which seem to have been due a combination of relatively poor tyres, a relatively poor vehicle, and absolutely awful advice from the vehicle manufacturer.
There seems to have been a subsequent trend among tyre manufactures to pass the buck to the vehicle manufacturer on as many issues as possible, and it may be that the lack of a recommended maximum pressure on the tyre reflects this kind of corporate-lawyer caution.
If so, I'd expect max pressures on tyre sidewalls to be an endangered species.