Occupy Wall Street: What do you think? (Part 2) POLL

[Tigerman]

No, TM. You are the one making my views on TC's lame post part of something else.

No. I'm not. I'm just making an observation.

As I said earlier, there is no necessity for posters to allocate their comments in some sort of even way.

And have I disagreed with that? Nope.

Are you suggesting I should defend the Tea Party before I can attack a daft post about OWS?

I've made no such suggestion. Again, I'm just pointing out the obious, as an observation. That's all.

Leave it alone: you are becoming boring.

Just making an observation!

The point I made is that those black clad anarchists do not represent OWS.

And I agreed. Or, did you miss that?

If you want to post about what does or does not represent the Tea Party, go ahead. But leave me out of it.

You've already left yourself out of similar comments re the TP. I'm just pointing the same out, as an observation! Understand?

[BigJohn]

The fact that I have not commented on the Tea Party is totally irrelevant; that is my point. Let it go.

[GuyInTaiwan]

I actually agree with BigJohn here. If people are talking about pizzas and hamburgers, either at the same time or on separate occasions, one person can freely comment on pizzas without being compelled to comment on hamburgers.

[TainanCowboy]

Another "lame post" about the damage left by OWS tools:
(Maybe add some pics later...LOL)

"DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES - According to the office of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, the Occupy L.A. encampment at City Hall left behind 25 tons of debris, killed more than an acre's worth of grass and destroyed some high-tech sprinklers. The damage is tentatively expected to cost taxpayers between $300,000 and $400,000."
Dead City Hall Lawn Brings Questions of Grassy Returns

Lets remember that Los Angeles, as is most of California, is financially broke. As in tapped-out...destitute. Tax-payers (those who actually work and pay taxes) are, again, stuck with the bill for the petulant
actions of the OWS wank-jobs.

more:

Fixing Destroyed L.A. City Hall Lawn After Occupy Protest
Press release on the subject.

[cfimages]

Tax-payers (those who actually work and pay taxes) are, again, stuck with the bill for the petulant
actions of the OWS wank-jobs.

The %age of unemployed in OWS was about the same as the %age in society in general. The majority of OWS are working tax payers.

[Tigerman]

The fact that I have not commented on the Tea Party is totally irrelevant; that is my point. Let it go.

What don't you understand re my point? Its very simple. I am not suggesting that you should do or refrain from doing anything, or saying anything. I am simply pointing out that you have commented on A but not on B. Its an observation and I am as free to make it as you are to refrain from commenting on B.

I actually agree with BigJohn here. If people are talking about pizzas and hamburgers, either at the same time or on separate occasions, one person can freely comment on pizzas without being compelled to comment on hamburgers.

Yes. Certainly. But, I am not asking that anyone comment on hamburgers, much less attempting to compel hamburger comments. I am simply observing that some people frequently comment on pizzas but never comment on hamburgers.

We're all free to make that observation, and likewise free to take from that observation anything we like.

[GuyInTaiwan]

Okay. I think maybe BigJohn thinks there's a subtle commentary behind that observation.

[BigJohn]

Okay. I think maybe BigJohn thinks there's a subtle commentary behind that observation.

Of course I do, thanks Guy. He is not implying a link between my comments on OWS and not doing so on the Tea Party, as if this was in some way indicative of something. Maybe it would be if I had made other types of comments about the Tea Party which seemed incongruous with ones I made about OWS, but I have not.The theme here is that anyone is saying something critical about someone saying something critical about OWS,and that connects to TM's endless battle against libs bashing cons.

But I'm not even a lib, I'm a centrist, so the whole thing is just annoying.

[Tigerman]

But I'm not even a lib, I'm a centrist...

Riiiiiight.

[BigJohn]

But I'm not even a lib, I'm a centrist...

Riiiiiight.

No, I am serious! I am a centrist. By Canadian standards, but then we ain't in Kansas anymore.

I hardly see what you would laugh at such a thing. Do you think I am deliberately lying, because manipulating the Flob is my one true secret passion?

Or do you think I don't understand the term?

Either way, I fail to see on what basis you would dismiss my claim.