Since the thread is called "The Obama is a big fat liar thread" I should think its safe to assume this is not a suggestion, but a statement of fact, or a claim. Which as others pointed out as a politician that pretty much counts for every politician. Is he the biggest fattest liar of the lot? That's not the feeling I get. But the suggestion he is a terrorist (or at the least an extreme radical), how else do you interpret this from your article?
I think there is sufficient evidence out there that suggests if not outright proves that Obama lies. Is he the biggest liar? Dunno, but he may end up being the most expensive one. It's not MY article. I don't write for Forbes or Investor's Business Daily. I wish.
Do you think this is the direction the presidential race will take, dont vote for Obama hes a radical black man? I hope not, dont you?
I think the only one talking about his race here is you. As for attacking him for his radical past, who knows? He is very secretive about his radical past, if it exists, and many suggest it does, then yeah I think it could make him less electable. Americans don't much mind protestors, but radical or aggressive in your face protestors tend to piss off the common man.
Mucha Man wrote:
Mick wrote:...Do you think this is the direction the presidential race will take, dont vote for Obama hes a radical black man? I hope not, dont you?
I hope so. It will only further marginalize the right which they so richly deserve.
Yeah, O is a secret this and that.
Only he's been in power for 3 years and is governing as a right of center democrat. If people want to make all kinds of conjecture about what radical things he might do in his second term they have simply excused themselves from rational discourse.
I would think the Left has been left out of the promises Obama made to them. There are many. And the fact that he has essentially continue Bush's policies on many fronts can't be all that pleasing.
Chris wrote:That foreign-born, socialist, rich-people-condemning, no-birth-certificate-having, healthcare-giving liberal!
Obama was born in Hawaii. If he is a socialist, he has not been a very successful one. I think he loves rich people, given how many of them turn up at his State dinners and fund raisers. He hasn't given anyone healthcare yet, and the Supreme Court will soon rule on whether or not he can. Liberal? meh.
Chris wrote: jdsmith wrote:
Great stuff. You can't make this up.
Sorry, but all that IS made up. This is the typical kind of garbage that right-wing conspiracy mongers make up. ACORN? For crying out loud. Bell? Unger? Ayers?? Puh-lease.
These nutty right-wing sources are LYING to us and it would behoove us not to make the mistake of believing them.
Forbes and Investor's Business Daily are right wing conspiracy mongers?
ACORN? What? Obama was the one who led people into city hall, blowing whistles and demanding to be heard, like there was any other option given the racket they were making, and then as president, signed a law making the same type of behavior illegal.
The anti-protestor law:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lee-camp/ ... 43728.html
I'm referring to the bill H.R. 347 that was signed by President Obama the other day, passed unanimously in the Senate, and 388-3 in the House. That's nearly EVERY SINGLE lawmaker. The last time they agreed that closely on something, it was a bill raising monthly Congressional pay to include a box of Ding Dongs, two erotic cakes featuring Bonanza star Pernell Roberts, and a gentle yet inquisitive prostate exam every Tuesday.
What did this magical universally-loved bill say? Well some are calling it the anti-Occupy law and it allows the government to bring charges against Americans involved in many kinds of political protest at any location the secret service, quote, "is or will be temporarily visiting." So basically if the government wants to shut down a protest, they just send a secret service officer down there to scratch his balls, and then they can start putting people in jail for a year or more.
This is all lovely except for that bitchy bothersome document, the Constitution. I believe somewhere in the back it says, "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech . . . or the right of the people peaceably to assemble." Aw shit! That musta sucked when Congress found that out! To get that close to passing it and then shot down? It musta been like getting hired to rub baby oil on the contestants of Miss Universe before the bathing suit portion of the competition and then losing your hands in a freak exploding cell phone accident! So when Congress heard about that first amendment they musta been like, "God damnit! That really f**ks up all our plans. That f**king line in the Constitution says not to do EXACTLY what we just did." That's what they must've said, right? ... They didn't just pass it anyway ... Right?
But the bill doesn't stop there. I mean, when you have the entirety of Congress with the exception of Ron Paul agreeing on something, why not swing for the fences? The bill also says it could be a federal crime to protest near an event of, quote, "national significance." Well, that's not vague at all. So you could be convicted of a federal crime and locked away for a year or more for the following things:
That's HuffPost, Chris. That horrible ring wing fear mongering site.
Winston Smith wrote:Obama isn't a liar. He's a puppet. If you've got a problem with the gap -- gulf -- between what he says and what he does take it up with the puppet masters.
God, are you one of those Illuminati lizard people finger pointers?