It'd be easier to explain cricket to Americans than science to Mr Smith.
Interesting. Did you NOT post the IPCC table? and is the MOST LIKELY scenario not an average of 0.6 degrees C? and there are no figures available for sealevel rise for that scenario but I have gone to the next one which starts at 0.18 and the following are 0.2. I went to an average of 0.3 on the table that YOU provided from YOUR all precious and wonderful IPCC report. Does one need to be a scientist to ask you to back up the information that you have provided? and given that it shows no catastrophic result at all, does that really mean that you have made any kind of logical argument at all? or am I missing something important here? relevant?
Again, are you suggesting that you agree with Morner/Gray that there are NO sealevel rises NOW but that there MAY be in the future and if so are you saying you agree with the MOST LIKELY assessment of the IPCC in which case 0.3 is more than generous of me no?
Perhaps you should try explaining cricket to me after all as you have done a shitass job of doing so on the sealevel increases. Play Ball!