Moderators: Mick, TheGingerMan
fred smith wrote:The growing gap between rich and everyone else, and the largely right wing policies (which Romney endorses) that got your country into this mess is a hot topic. Romney is a springboard for this debate, irrespective of whether his particular tax records have anything useful to say.
One imagines that if Obama wins that this discussion of the gap between rich and everyone else will dry up much like one's interest in oh say any number of other principled positions. Wanna bet?

fred smith wrote:The growing gap between rich and everyone else, and the largely right wing policies (which Romney endorses) that got your country into this mess is a hot topic. Romney is a springboard for this debate, irrespective of whether his particular tax records have anything useful to say.
One imagines that if Obama wins that this discussion of the gap between rich and everyone else will dry up much like one's interest in oh say any number of other principled positions. Wanna bet?


Muzha Man wrote:The only thing that's dried up Fred is my interest in debating you, and pretty much the entire Fcom right. This should not be confused with a lack of interest in my own positions, though it doesn't surprise me that understanding this is is a challenge for you.


Chris wrote:Conservative ideas are presented here, but are rejected (or laughed away) because they have zero basis in reason or reality; they are often far too absurd to even be considered for rational inquiry. Most of those who defend such conservative ideas have proven unwilling or unable to engage in rational debate. (There are a few notable exceptions, but their voices get drowned out here.)
The political threads far too often degrade into circle-jerks of right-wing bluster and absurdity, laden with personal attacks against liberal members. That's why I grew tired of debating them long ago; one cannot reason with those who do not apply reason. Instead, now I prefer to push their buttons for my amusement.


johnny138 wrote:Muzha Man wrote:The only thing that's dried up Fred is my interest in debating you, and pretty much the entire Fcom right. This should not be confused with a lack of interest in my own positions, though it doesn't surprise me that understanding this is is a challenge for you.
You have an interest in your own positions? Wow.
There is NO debate with liberals. Conservative ideas are presented but never addressed. Instead, there's namecalling, videos that are posted that aren't even watched, whining and moaning that links presented don't come from left-wing sites, and finally:
Conservatives just want them all to die!!
That's been the response to numerous conservative attempts at dialogue.
If that's the concept of "debate" that the left has then they're doing brilliantly.

johnny138 wrote:Muzha Man wrote:The only thing that's dried up Fred is my interest in debating you, and pretty much the entire Fcom right. This should not be confused with a lack of interest in my own positions, though it doesn't surprise me that understanding this is is a challenge for you.
You have an interest in your own positions? Wow.
There is NO debate with liberals. Conservative ideas are presented but never addressed. Instead, there's namecalling, videos that are posted that aren't even watched, whining and moaning that links presented don't come from left-wing sites, and finally:
Conservatives just want them all to die!!
That's been the response to numerous conservative attempts at dialogue.
If that's the concept of "debate" that the left has then they're doing brilliantly.


BigJohn wrote:I disagree. Conservative opinions do have value. It's just that rowdy religious right-wing Republican opinions are obnoxious.

Return to International Politics
Forumosans browsing this forum: No Forumosans and 2 visitors