Moderators: Mick, TheGingerMan

cfimages wrote:Then retreat. Wait until things cool down, round em up and deport them.
NewYorker wrote:cfimages wrote:Then retreat. Wait until things cool down, round em up and deport them.
Is that before or after one of them blows themselves up?

Then retreat. Wait until things cool down, round em up and deport them.
Is that before or after one of them blows themselves up?
And so the cycle continues.
If you look at the history of the various intifada's over the past decade or so, you'll see that suicide bombing always follows violent, lethal action by the Israeli forces. Without that response from the military, the protests generally don't go much beyond rocks being thrown. The problem is when it escalates which firing on unarmed people is quite likely to cause.

cfimages wrote:A mob of unarmed protesters is hardly a threat to sovereignty.


NewYorker wrote:cfimages wrote:A mob of unarmed protesters is hardly a threat to sovereignty.
Great as long as they stay on there side of the fence you are absolutely right. The moment they cross the fence they need to comply with orders. These guys aren't grandmas and grandpas, they are young radicalized men, the moment they elude capture, one of them may very well harm civilians.

cfimages wrote:A mob of unarmed protesters is hardly a threat to sovereignty.

Got To Be Kidding wrote:cfimages wrote:A mob of unarmed protesters is hardly a threat to sovereignty.
No, but it is a threat to security. Israeli towns and villages are not far from these borders, and they have had way too much experience with what happens when young Syrians enter their towns.
A threat to sovereignty and a threat to security are two different things.
.they believe they are protecting there sovereignty

Return to International Politics
Forumosans browsing this forum: No Forumosans and 1 visitor