Taiwan: independence/(re)unification/status quo/referendum?

Topics related to Taiwan and Taiwan/China issues can be discussed here. Threads dealing with Taiwan's history belong in the Culture & History thread. Please do not post articles - use links instead. Quoted sources should be limited to one paragraph in length, or less. If you see a post that you feel is against the rules, please send a report to the moderators so we can look into it

Moderator: TheGingerMan

Forum rules
Threads dealing with Taiwan's history belong in the Culture & History thread. Please do not post articles - use links instead. Quoted sources should be limited to one paragraph in length, or less. If you see a post that you feel is against the rules, you can send a report to the moderators so we can look into it

Taiwan: independence/reunification or...

Taiwan is a province of China, whose legitimate government is the PRC, and should reunify as soon as possible.
16
5%
Taiwan part of China, but the PRC are usurpers. The ROC should reconquer the Mainland.
14
4%
Taiwan should unify with China once China reforms to become a free democratic country.
20
6%
Taiwan should negotiate with China to have a close relationship, but with as many freedoms as can be agreed upon.
39
12%
Taiwan should seek to maintain the status quo as long as possible.
21
6%
Taiwan is effectively independent, but China prevents this from being formalised. Taiwan should try to slowly and carefully move towards de jure independence.
139
43%
Taiwan should declare independence now.
29
9%
Taiwan should bide its time until the circumstances allow for a referendum for Taiwanese to determine their future.
49
15%
 
Total votes : 327

Re: Taiwan: independence/(re)unification/status quo/referend

Postby ludahai » 27 Aug 2010, 20:41

Elegua wrote:In Taiwan were to join, we'd need to get another state as well. It is really hard to arrange 51 stars into a symetric pattern on a flag. 52 on the other hand.... :ponder:

Puerto Rico or the UP of Michigan would be the most likely candidates...
I have a dream, a dream where a democratic China lives side by side with Taiwan, Tibet, and Turkestan, all free and democratic.
ludahai
Combat Zone Mama-san (zhànqū māma sāng)
Combat Zone Mama-san (zhànqū māma sāng)
 
Posts: 1629
Joined: 25 Jul 2003, 17:57
Location: 臺灣國臺中市
1 Recognized(s)

6000

Re: Taiwan: independence/(re)unification/status quo/referend

Postby ninman » 01 Sep 2010, 16:35

What difference does it make? Taiwan will never get recognition from the UN no matter how much they beg for it. All they will do is piss China off. China is a permanent member of the security council with the power of vito, any petitions would be blocked, and you risk attack from China. Personally though I think they should declare independence, if they want it, they have to be willing to fight for it.
ninman
Breakfast Store Laoban (zǎocān diàn lǎobǎn)
Breakfast Store Laoban (zǎocān diàn lǎobǎn)
 
Posts: 145
Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 14:30

6000

Re: Taiwan: independence/(re)unification/status quo/referend

Postby zoossh » 08 Nov 2010, 21:59

ninman wrote:What difference does it make? Taiwan will never get recognition from the UN no matter how much they beg for it. All they will do is piss China off. China is a permanent member of the security council with the power of vito, any petitions would be blocked, and you risk attack from China. Personally though I think they should declare independence, if they want it, they have to be willing to fight for it.


the de jure status is less important than the national identity, or the absence of such.

on the one extreme, you have the pro-china side who believes that the 85% ben sheng ren should be subjected to cultural definition by the beliefs of the wai sheng ren, since their holo and hakka counterparts in china is subjected so. they believe that Taiwan's fate and identity should be decided by the interest and belief of the PRC chinese and the taiwanese wai sheng ren, and that the identity and will of the taiwanese ben sheng ren, with regards to Taiwan's status, should be ignored

on the other extreme, you have the anti-wai sheng ren side who believes that taiwan belongs to only the aborigines, and the taiwanese holo and hakka communities, and since wai sheng ren still feel that the taiwanese wai sheng ren is afflicted with china, they should not be considered as taiwanese. they disregard the fact is chinese heritage is one of the many components towards the cultural identity of Taiwan, and attempts to deny that.

the neutral ground should be that the ben sheng and wai sheng ren subjecting their beliefs on themselves and not imposing the cultural identity on each other, and that Taiwan's identity is only be decided by the majority, of those who believe that they are, first and foremost, a taiwanese. it will be futile to fight for anything outside of Taiwan when someone is pulling your tail back home.
[url="http://www.clubsnap.org/forums/showthread.php?t=245883"]Newbie guide + pricelist[/url], [url="http://www.clubsnap.org/forums/showthread.php?t=287269"]Backpacking & Photography[/url]
Forumosan avatar
zoossh
Memorized My Password (gāng jìhǎo zìjǐ de mìmǎ)
 
Posts: 48
Joined: 05 Aug 2007, 19:59

6000

Re: Taiwan: independence/(re)unification/status quo/referend

Postby Mucha Man » 09 Nov 2010, 01:47

zoossh wrote:the neutral ground should be that the ben sheng and wai sheng ren subjecting their beliefs on themselves and not imposing the cultural identity on each other, and that Taiwan's identity is only be decided by the majority, of those who believe that they are, first and foremost, a taiwanese. it will be futile to fight for anything outside of Taiwan when someone is pulling your tail back home.


This has been happening for the past 20 years. The KMT officially gave up trying to direct Taiwanese culture in the late 80s. Glad you noticed the result. :lol:
“Everywhere else in the world is also really old” said Prof. Liu, a renowned historian at Beijing University. “We always learn that China has 5000 years of cultural heritage, and that therefore we are very special. It appears that other places also have some of this heritage stuff. And are also old. Like, really old.”

http://hikingintaiwan.blogspot.com/
Forumosan avatar
Mucha Man
Guan Yin (Guānyīn)
 
Posts: 16113
Joined: 01 Nov 2001, 17:01
Location: Mucha, of course
310 Recognized(s)

6000

Re: Taiwan: independence/(re)unification/status quo/referendum?

Postby Red Fox Ace » 09 Mar 2011, 09:38

Independence.

All the way.

This post was recommended by Sake (08 Aug 2012, 10:15)
Rating: 5.88%
Forumosan avatar
Red Fox Ace
Ink Still Wet in Passport (shífēn xīnshǒu)
Ink Still Wet in Passport (shífēn xīnshǒu)
 
Posts: 20
Joined: 07 Mar 2011, 08:19
2 Recognized(s)

6000

Re: Taiwan: independence/(re)unification/status quo/referendum?

Postby tainan666 » 28 Mar 2011, 12:12

As I said in the other thread, what will happen about this issue is not my business, because I don't have any interest in this issue. So I will not take the side of any of the options in the poll.

But from my point of view, I think that in 20 or 30 years or so from now, many people who want independence will change their mind because China grows really fast and will become more and more powerful. But anything can happen... We will see.
tainan666
Ink Still Wet in Passport (shífēn xīnshǒu)
Ink Still Wet in Passport (shífēn xīnshǒu)
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 16 Mar 2011, 23:03

6000

Re: Taiwan: independence/(re)unification/status quo/referendum?

Postby conta » 28 Mar 2011, 23:27

is there website where i could find all history (+ now) about this issue ?

objective, I mean
if I'm lucky enough, I'll see you in september ;]

[i]I am extremly normal, considering how abnormal I am[/i]
Forumosan avatar
conta
Càiniǎo
Càiniǎo
 
Posts: 37
Joined: 07 Feb 2011, 05:32
Location: The Earth

6000

Re: Taiwan: independence/(re)unification/status quo/referendum?

Postby goingstrong » 29 Mar 2011, 12:19

Geeze, I thought I submitted a vote for this poll a long time ago. Guess not. So, there. My vote is in for number 122.

Red Fox Ace wrote:Independence.

All the way.


:cool: Right on. Right on.

tainan666 wrote:But from my point of view, I think that in 20 or 30 years or so from now, many people who want independence will change their mind because China grows really fast and will become more and more powerful. But anything can happen... We will see.


Hmmm... China will grow in economics until it pops somewhere. It may be #2 now, but that's only in money. It is still on the lower end of the scale for other things as long as the CPP is in power. So, you're thinking that people will want to join a bigger country for money? Raarw... Currently, Taiwan is already successful on its own terms. In 20-30 years from now, I think some of the people, who do not want (even this current technical) independence, might change their minds. We'll see indeed. ^___^
...
goingstrong
Breakfast Store Laoban (zǎocān diàn lǎobǎn)
Breakfast Store Laoban (zǎocān diàn lǎobǎn)
 
Posts: 128
Joined: 08 Apr 2008, 06:05

6000

Re: Taiwan: independence/(re)unification/status quo/referend

Postby Nick007 » 20 May 2011, 17:15

ninman wrote:What difference does it make? Taiwan will never get recognition from the UN no matter how much they beg for it. All they will do is piss China off. China is a permanent member of the security council with the power of vito, any petitions would be blocked, and you risk attack from China. Personally though I think they should declare independence, if they want it, they have to be willing to fight for it.
China's veto power only carries as much power as we allow it to carry. Mongolia entered the UN in the 1950's. Taiwan (ROC) was at the time a UN member with a seat on the UN security council. They had the ability to veto. But their veto power didn't keep Mongolia out. The ROC constitution claims sovereignty over mongolia just like the PRC constitution claims sovereignty over Taiwan. Besides in 1971 when PRC finally got in, well ROC's veto power didn't have an effect.

Now if the US were to finally live up to it's principles of democracy and liberty as it's taught in American school text books, and put pressure on as many countries in the world possible also to recognize Taiwan and support their UN membership bid, then the pressure is on China. If every western country and every EU member state were to threaten sanctions against China as long as they keep trying to keep Taiwan out of the UN, China would just drop it and let Taiwan in no questions asked.

At the end of the day if Taiwan becomes more trouble for China than what it's worth, China won't bother Taiwan anymore. Just like with Mongolia and parts of Russia. It turned out to be way more trouble than what it would even be worth. Russia supported independence for Mongolia and PRC willingly agreed that those parts of Russia which were part of China before are now Russian territory. Too much trouble to claim those areas, so it was just easier just to simply let them go.
Nick007
Càiniǎo
Càiniǎo
 
Posts: 31
Joined: 09 Apr 2011, 10:40

6000

Re: Taiwan: independence/(re)unification/status quo/referend

Postby ludahai » 17 Jul 2011, 12:35

Nick007 wrote:China's veto power only carries as much power as we allow it to carry. Mongolia entered the UN in the 1950's. Taiwan (ROC) was at the time a UN member with a seat on the UN security council. They had the ability to veto. But their veto power didn't keep Mongolia out. The ROC constitution claims sovereignty over mongolia just like the PRC constitution claims sovereignty over Taiwan. Besides in 1971 when PRC finally got in, well ROC's veto power didn't have an effect.


China (ROC) did not use its veto power in the Security Council to block advisement of it's acceptance by the GA.

As for 1971, that never went to the Security Council. The GA ruled that it wasn't a matter of admitting a new member, but rather "restoring" the rights to the rightful sovereign power. Transferring UN rights to successor states has become routine (especially since the collapse of the USSR), but while this was not the first time a successor regime took the seat of a prior regime in the UN, it was the most controversial.

Now if the US were to finally live up to it's principles of democracy and liberty as it's taught in American school text books, and put pressure on as many countries in the world possible also to recognize Taiwan and support their UN membership bid, then the pressure is on China. If every western country and every EU member state were to threaten sanctions against China as long as they keep trying to keep Taiwan out of the UN, China would just drop it and let Taiwan in no questions asked.


Totally agree with this, but it won't happen unless China does something really egregious...

At the end of the day if Taiwan becomes more trouble for China than what it's worth, China won't bother Taiwan anymore. Just like with Mongolia and parts of Russia. It turned out to be way more trouble than what it would even be worth. Russia supported independence for Mongolia and PRC willingly agreed that those parts of Russia which were part of China before are now Russian territory. Too much trouble to claim those areas, so it was just easier just to simply let them go.


Were China a rational actor, it would realize that a friendly, independent Taiwan working together with China (and most Taiwanese genuinely want this as best I can tell) would be far better for Taiwan than either the status quo or forcibly incorporating a very uncooperative Taiwan.
I have a dream, a dream where a democratic China lives side by side with Taiwan, Tibet, and Turkestan, all free and democratic.
ludahai
Combat Zone Mama-san (zhànqū māma sāng)
Combat Zone Mama-san (zhànqū māma sāng)
 
Posts: 1629
Joined: 25 Jul 2003, 17:57
Location: 臺灣國臺中市
1 Recognized(s)

6000

PreviousNext




Return to Taiwan Politics



Who is online

Forumosans browsing this forum: No Forumosans and 1 visitor

If we would only give, just once, the same amount of reflection to what we want to get out of life that we give to the question of what to do with a two weeks' vacation, we would be startled at our false standards and the aimless procession of our busy days -- DOROTHY CANFIELD FISHER